Misplaced Pages

Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. Jackson

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

2010 United States Supreme Court case
Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. Jackson
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 21, 2010
Full case nameRent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. Jackson
Citations561 U.S. 63 (more)
Holding
Under the Federal Arbitration Act, where an agreement to arbitrate includes an agreement that the arbitrator will determine whether the agreement is enforceable, if a party challenges specifically the enforceability of that particular agreement, the district court considers the challenge. However, if a party challenges the enforceability of the agreement as a whole, the challenge is for the arbitrator.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
John P. Stevens · Antonin Scalia
Anthony Kennedy · Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor
Case opinions
MajorityScalia
DissentStevens, joined by Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor
Laws applied
Federal Arbitration Act

Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. Jackson, 561 U.S. 63 (2010), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that under the Federal Arbitration Act, where an agreement to arbitrate includes an agreement that the arbitrator will determine whether the agreement is enforceable, if a party challenges specifically the enforceability of that particular agreement, the district court considers the challenge. However, if a party challenges the enforceability of the agreement as a whole, the challenge is for the arbitrator.

References

  1. Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. Jackson, 561 U.S. 63 (2010).
  2. "New rule for deciding validity of agreements to arbitrate arbitration". SCOTUSblog. June 21, 2010. Retrieved October 29, 2024.

External links

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain. "he Court is unanimously of opinion that no reporter has or can have any copyright in the written opinions delivered by this Court." Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 591, 668 (1834)


Stub icon

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories:
Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. Jackson Add topic