2008 United States Supreme Court case
| Irizarry v. United States | |
|---|---|
 Supreme Court of the United States | |
| Decided June 12, 2008 | |
| Full case name | Irizarry v. United States |
| Citations | 553 U.S. 708 (more) |
| Holding | |
| Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(h) does not apply to a variance from a recommended Federal Sentencing Guidelines range; that rule applies only to "departures." | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Stevens |
| Dissent | Breyer, joined by Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg |
| Laws applied | |
| Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(h) | |
Irizarry v. United States, 553 U.S. 708 (2008), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(h) does not apply to a variance from a recommended Federal Sentencing Guidelines range; that rule applies only to "departures."
References
- Irizarry v. United States, 553 U.S. 708 (2008).
- "Opinion Recap: Irizarry v. US". SCOTUSblog. June 15, 2008. Retrieved December 4, 2024.
External links
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |